Austin Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu
Student Housing in Greater Austin

Student Housing in Austin, TX

Compare 76 student housing options in Austin, TX. What to look for in a lease, typical costs, and how our scoring ranks the best complexes.

Student housing in Austin covers apartments, condos, and purpose-built complexes marketed to college students, most of them within a short drive or bus ride of the University of Texas campus and the surrounding West Campus and Riverside corridors. This category includes 76 businesses, ranging from large complexes with resort-style pools and study lounges to smaller, no-frills buildings where the main selling point is a cheap rent and a short walk to class.

The service itself usually means more than just a unit to rent. Most student-focused properties lease by the bed rather than by the unit, so roommates sign individual contracts and each person is only on the hook for their own room. Many also bundle in furniture, utilities, and internet, and some run shuttle service to campus during the school year. That bundling is convenient, but it also makes prices harder to compare property to property unless you break the total cost down into rent plus fees plus utilities.

What to check before you sign

  • Real walking or shuttle time to campus, not just the distance shown on a map, especially during early morning classes or Texas summer heat.
  • What is actually included in the advertised rent: utilities, internet, parking, and whether furniture is optional or required (and priced separately).
  • Lease terms and turnover: most Austin student leases run August to July regardless of the academic calendar, so ask about summer sublease rules and move-out timing.
  • Security, maintenance response time, and noise policy, since these vary a lot between complexes built for students versus general renters.
  • Parking availability and cost, which is a real constraint near UT and can add a meaningful amount to monthly cost.

Our scoring weighs verified reviews, responsiveness, and consistency of service over time, so you can compare properties on more than just glossy photos and move-in specials. For a ranked shortlist of the top-rated complexes in the city, see our best apartment complexes in Austin, TX guide. Details on how we calculate those rankings are on our methodology page.

Check availability for student housing in Austin, TX

No cost and no obligation. Share a few details and we'll connect you with a good fit.

Check availability

All student housing in Austin, TX, ranked by score and relevance

76 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is student housing, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Texan 26
#1
62

Texan 26

3.7(104)✓ Google-verified

Staff and maintenance earn consistent praise for their friendliness, speed, and willingness to tackle repairs that other complexes would dismiss. Patrick, Taylor, Jaia, Damaris, Ruben, and other named team members are repeatedly cited for going beyond standard fixes, replacing appliances rather than patching them, and treating residents like family. Community events have improved morale. However, persistent issues undercut the experience: frat noise reaches eardrum-damaging levels even on weeknights, parking passes have been towed despite residents being registered and warned in advance, and elevator outages leave tenants stranded. For some residents, management responsiveness appears to vary by tenure or time period. The building shows age, and repair timelines swing from same-day to weeks, making reliability a gamble. The 3.7 rating across 104 reviews reflects this split. Residents who experience the engaged management and quick maintenance tier leave glowing recommendations and renew leases. Those caught in noise conflicts, towing disputes, or maintenance gaps feel blindsided and regret moving in. The property's location near campus and affordability relative to newer West Campus towers are genuine draws, but they do not insulate against the noise and parking friction that plague some tenants.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Davies Ranch
#2
77

Davies Ranch

4.3(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Davies Ranch earns consistent praise for leasing staff like Angelica, Estella, and Trilby, who make apartment tours welcoming and thorough. Residents highlight maintenance responsiveness (especially Franklin's quick AC repairs), meticulously groomed landscaping, dog wash stations, fiber internet reliability, and spacious units with granite and stainless finishes. Multiple years of rent reductions and fair move-out charges stand out as unusual positives. However, three one-star reviews raise concerns about inconsistent professionalism at the leasing desk, pricing quote discrepancies, and safety issues including break-ins and trash left outside units. One reviewer felt dismissed when questioning price changes; another reported rudeness when requesting a manager. Management awareness of security incidents appears limited in some accounts.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Marquis at Great Hills
#3
76

Marquis at Great Hills

4.1(286)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the quiet, tree-filled setting and responsive staff who handle maintenance requests within hours. The complex sits near major retailers, restaurants, and Gateway Shopping Center, with standout amenities including a resort-style pool, gym, parking garage, and car wash station. Longtime tenants report strong relationships with management, particularly naming staff members Diana and Will at the leasing office and Antonio on maintenance. Most cite convenient access to downtown (roughly 15 minutes) and appreciate the blend of urban proximity and community feel. A few mention pricing could be more competitive, though most balance cost against the location and service quality.

Student Housing
Marquis Parkside
#4
75

Marquis Parkside

4.2(534)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing staff for attentiveness and the maintenance team for quick responses to service requests. The community is consistently noted as clean, well-maintained, and quiet, with convenient access to shopping and highways near North Lamar. However, some visitors report cold or dismissive leasing interactions, and long-term residents complain that rents feel steep for what's offered, gates break frequently, and the mailroom has been broken into multiple times. These issues suggest inconsistent management responses across different time periods or departments.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Marquis at Treetops
#5
73

Marquis at Treetops

4.4(177)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence masks systemic problems. Nick and Adrean lead a maintenance team that residents consistently praise for speed, warmth, and genuine care. The hilltop location, wildlife, quiet grounds, and views draw people in. But corporate (CWS Apartments) ignores safety complaints: dangerous traffic flow at the entrance gate, extreme lighting that violates Austin code, and a dumpster left near units for weeks. Move-out fees for minor items and poor-quality finishes compound frustration. Residents report months of unanswered calls to corporate and a powerless on-site team. The 1-star reviews detail civil negligence concerns and plead for others to avoid the property. This is a place with exceptional staff doing their best against management indifference.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments

Check availability for student housing in Austin, TX

No cost and no obligation. Share a few details and we'll connect you with a good fit.

Check availability
Marquis at Caprock Canyon
#6
72

Marquis at Caprock Canyon

4.1(134)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents repeatedly highlight fast maintenance response, a quiet nature-filled setting with deer, and genuine staff who make move-in stress-free. The community delivers on pool, gym, and walking trail amenities while keeping costs below category average. However, new or departing tenants report unfair move-out charges (one charged $1,000 for a nail), security concerns from unmanned gates enabling car break-ins, and interiors that feel outdated relative to rent. Annual price hikes stack friction when management shrugs at deteriorating conditions rather than invest in the property.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Royce at 8100
#7
83

The Royce at 8100

4.5(439)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently highlight staff responsiveness and a welcoming community atmosphere. Sarah, Hannah, Faith, Mike, and Armando are frequently named for their helpfulness during leasing and maintenance. Reviewers praise amenities like the pool, gym, billiards, and dog park, along with modern finishes and the gated security. A handful note AC noise and occasional neighbor noise, but the most serious concern involves vehicle break-ins affecting a few residents' work tools and equipment. The leasing office handles multiple events monthly to build community. Move-in apartments arrive clean, and maintenance responds promptly to requests. Parents find the environment supportive. One long-term resident valued fair pricing relative to what the property offers. Most complaints are limited to external noise or specific safety incidents rather than management failures.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 Housing
Bridge at Windsor Park
#8
79

Bridge at Windsor Park

4.7(264)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Bridge at Windsor Park holds a 4.7 rating across 264 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Parmer Place Apartments
#9
71

Parmer Place Apartments

4.2(305)✓ Google-verified

Strong staff goodwill masks serious property maintenance gaps. Five-star reviews highlight Geovonni and office team as genuinely responsive and personable. However, recent reviews detail stained and spray-painted apartments sent to residents uncleaned, persistent animal waste in common areas, overgrown pest problems (ant mounds, hornet nests), and months-old dead animals left on grounds. Maintenance delays during heat emergencies and unanswered calls create trust problems. The complex shines in personal service but struggles with standards and follow-through on basic upkeep.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Nova North Apartments
#10
71

Nova North Apartments

4.2(197)✓ Google-verified

Office and maintenance staff earn consistent praise for responsiveness and helpfulness, especially during the leasing process. Long-term residents report satisfaction with staff quality. However, management does not enforce noise complaints against neighbors, leaving affected residents stuck between disruptive tenants and no support. New arrivals note slow repairs, frequent late-night activity, regular police visits, and a severe parking shortage with $45/month lot fees, creating a last-resort feel for budget-conscious students.

Student Housing
DK Riata
#11
79

DK Riata

4.4(237)✓ Google-verified

Management staff Walter, Corinne, and Angelica earn consistent praise for responsiveness and patience through move-in and lease questions. Maintenance responds in one to two days for most requests, and grounds stay clean. The quiet neighborhood and convenient location draw residents seeking apartments close to work, though thin walls occasionally carry neighbor noise and rain-gutter sounds. Security remains inconsistent, and a few residents reported car break-ins despite on-site presence. Pest control is effective once applied, though cockroaches appear intermittently.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Tramor at the Hills
#12
77

Tramor at the Hills

4.6(86)✓ Google-verified

Tramor at the Hills holds a 4.6 rating across 86 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Stonelake at the Arboretum
#13
77

Stonelake at the Arboretum

4.3(316)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the location near restaurants, shopping, and transit hubs, along with responsive maintenance staff who handle requests within a day. Yvonne, Daniel, Amanda, and Alfredo stand out for going above and beyond in service and professionalism. The community draws recurring concern over broken gates, security incidents including catalytic converter theft, and pests; one resident also reported serious safety worries about maintenance staff behavior. Prices sit above comparable older complexes, though many say the upkeep justifies the cost.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Revolve
#14
76

Revolve

4.1(216)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

New residents consistently highlight Alexandra, Alex, and Janaye as genuinely welcoming staff who ease the move-in process with clear answers and personal attention. The modern building, Highland location, and inclusive community feel draw repeat praise, though early hiccups with door access and missing pet amenities haven't deterred most from staying or recommending the place. Staff go beyond the job: they help track down lost packages, discuss puppy logistics, and handle renewals with care. One resident called the assistant community manager essential to their move-in success. The building itself appeals to first-time renters seeking a polished, newer space with professional service backing it up.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Ironhorse Flats
#15
75

Ironhorse Flats

4.2(294)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the staff's friendliness and quick response times to maintenance and questions. Management teams like Martha, Nina, Raciel, Vento, and Ruzlan are named repeatedly for going above and beyond. The property is clean and well-kept. However, two recent reviews describe aggressive towing of guest vehicles at $300+ with inadequate signage, and describe the office as unhelpful when challenged. The community appeals to renters seeking a personal, welcoming environment. Move-in was smooth for most, with one reviewer noting the A/C was fixed in days. Pricing ranges from $850 to $1,300 monthly, and amenities include a fitness center, pool, and bark park. The towing issue appears isolated to guest parking but has damaged trust among at least two visitors.

Student HousingTownhome & Garden-Style CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Woodstone
#16
75

Woodstone

4.3(121)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and first-time renters consistently praise Woodstone's quiet setting and staff warmth, particularly Elizabeth and maintenance workers like Rodney and Christian who respond quickly and go above and beyond. However, some critical repairs linger for months (AC units, water heater problems, exterior damage), and shared spaces like the laundry room go uncleaned; noise complaints suggest management struggles to enforce quiet standards despite trying. The complex appeals to student renters and pet owners seeking a calm neighborhood near schools, but expect occasional hiccups with office accessibility and be prepared that building age shows. Staff names surface repeatedly as the real draw here.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Cricket Hollow Apartments
#17
68

Cricket Hollow Apartments

4.0(273)✓ Google-verified

Cricket Hollow delivers solid value and responsive management when things go right, with named staff like Jessica and Aries earning praise for quick action and attentiveness. The property itself is clean and well-kept, but complaints about weekend noise, pest control failures, maintenance communication barriers, and utility problems cut through the positive reviews and suggest service inconsistency is a real issue.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Nolina Flats
#18
75

Nolina Flats

4.2(190)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently highlight the team's warmth and maintenance speed, with many praising how the property feels like home. Several note the quiet setting on 620, plentiful parking, and well-kept common areas. However, a small but vocal group report delayed responses to maintenance (one patio leak left unresolved for six months), selective vehicle towing, gate security lapses, and disputes over lease-break charges and deposit returns that stretched months.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Allegre Point Apartments
#19
75

Allegre Point Apartments

4.1(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the leasing and management team, particularly LaTanya, Arlene, and Hermes, for attentive service that extends from application through move-in and beyond. The property itself earns marks for cleanliness, quiet atmosphere, and responsive maintenance; many residents report staying multiple years and feeling genuinely welcomed. One documented complaint about a credit reporting error that went unresolved for over a week stands as a rare gap in an otherwise uniformly positive record. The community fosters a social environment through events, a shared pantry, and casual friendliness among residents, while maintaining the peace that attracts those seeking calm surroundings. Maintenance requests are handled promptly, and staff take time to explain issues thoroughly so residents understand solutions. The gated layout appeals to safety-conscious renters.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Marquis at Ladera Vista
#20
75

Marquis at Ladera Vista

4.3(108)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report a peaceful, well-run community where maintenance responds quickly and staff remembers their names. The grounds feel private despite proximity to U.S. 183, with mature trees and walking trails where residents spot deer and wildlife. Several longtime tenants renewed leases and chose to stay longer than planned. However, two significant complaints temper this picture. One recent resident dealt with widespread fire ants and alleged poor management response; another felt misled about washer/dryer inclusions and uneven flooring in a unit marketed as renovated. A handful mention rising rents yearly and mention summer heat and winter cold penetrating units, contradicting the prevailing praise for quiet, well-insulated living spaces.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
The Marquis at Brushy Creek
#21
74

The Marquis at Brushy Creek

4.1(294)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Rolando, Julianna, Lacey, and Ashley consistently earn five-star praise for speed and care. The grounds are peaceful with green space, pools, and gyms; move-ins feel smooth and units arrive clean. Security and management responsiveness represent the real split: while most residents feel safe and hear quick responses to maintenance, a vocal minority report car window breaks, garage theft, and management indifference to safety complaints and unexplained charges. The strongest testimonials come from families drawn by the school district location and quiet atmosphere. Reviewers note that families stay long-term, many renewing leases. Maintenance responses happen same-day for routine requests and immediately for emergencies. The leasing process draws consistent praise as easy and attentive, though the one-star reviews paint a sharply different picture of avoidance and negligence.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
MAA Canyon Creek
#22
74

MAA Canyon Creek

4.1(265)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise maintenance staff, particularly Manuel Melo, who handle urgent repairs the same day and stay professional throughout. The community feels clean and quiet, with management that responds quickly to concerns. However, incoming tenants report dirty units with prior damage not cleaned before move-in. Appliance repairs lag significantly (two weeks minimum), and office staffing limitations reduce weekday availability. Some existing residents feel penalized by rent hikes of $80-100 per month while new units rent for $300-400 less.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Vaughan
#23
72

The Vaughan

4.2(90)✓ Google-verified

Residents and agents consistently praise the leasing team, especially Bryan Marte and Nick, for going above and beyond with patience and responsiveness. Units are spacious, modern, and clean, with standout amenities like the pool and proximity to EastVillage shops. However, some long-term residents report serious friction on exit: excessive move-out charges sent to collections, unresponsive management during disputes, and lingering maintenance issues like pest problems and limited cleaning schedules. Parking demand exceeds supply, forcing many to pay for reserved spots.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Bexley at Tech Ridge Apartments
#24
72

Bexley at Tech Ridge Apartments

4.0(209)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Beto Arellano's maintenance work, noting same-day repairs and friendly service that resolves issues quickly. Common pleasures include clean units and attentive staff like Matt and Valerie. However, a small number report serious concerns: roaches and mold in units, trash in common areas, car break-ins, and aging appliances that fail regularly. The fitness center is noted as small and crowded. The strong five-star cluster likely reflects recent high engagement from satisfied residents, while the one and two-star reviews (22% of all ratings) flag safety and cleanliness problems that merit direct inquiry before leasing.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Esperanza Domain
#25
70

Esperanza Domain

4.1(246)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Visitors and residents consistently praise staff warmth and maintenance responsiveness, with move-ins and tours handled smoothly by leasing team members like Alex and Kaitlyn. The pool, location, and amenities earn regular compliments. However, parking garage crime has escalated, the app-based entry system has failed residents, and a shift in management tone has left some residents frustrated with billing transparency, conflict resolution, and follow-up on maintenance requests. Several recent applicants report being charged $350 application fees without clear documentation or confirmation, facing collection threats when they disputed charges. One long-term resident noted that morale declined after a management change, with communication becoming defensive rather than solution-focused. Another faced a vehicle tow after brief unloading and described the response as dismissive rather than helpful.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Bellrock La Frontera
#26
71

Bellrock La Frontera

4.2(231)✓ Google-verified

Staff stars like Killish and Nadir earn consistent praise for welcoming tours and quick responsiveness, and many residents love the spacious layouts, dog parks, and convenient location near downtown. However, recent management changes have sparked frustration: a serious roof leak went unaddressed for weeks, a resident was offered just $125 compensation and a week to relocate, pest control services require requests despite tenant fees, and security often doesn't respond to noise complaints or towing disputes. Long-term residents speak warmly of the community and courtesy officers, yet newer complaints suggest follow-through on maintenance and administrative tasks has slipped. The property itself-pools, trails, gym, well-kept units-consistently impresses. What stumbles is the gap between one-off staff excellence and systemic accountability. Parking towing has cycled through three agencies with no resolution, lease paperwork goes unsigned into systems, and patio cleaning or pest visits don't always happen. Reviewers note an overall decline since new management took over.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Parkside Crossing Apartments
#27
71

Parkside Crossing Apartments

3.6(188)✓ Google-verified

For two years or more, families at Parkside Crossing experience quiet, well-kept grounds with attentive staff who fix maintenance issues within days. The resort-style pool, pet park, fitness center, and playground draw locals, and both long-term residents and newcomers praise the responsive leasing team, especially Sarah and Tina. Maintenance requests typically resolve within two business days. The property sits conveniently between downtown Austin and Round Rock, with nearby schools and shops. Residents consistently note the peaceful atmosphere and the staff's professional, welcoming approach to concerns and day-to-day needs.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Ten Oaks
#28
69

Ten Oaks

4.1(263)✓ Google-verified

Ten Oaks delivers strong first impressions and solid grounds maintenance, with leasing staff and property management earning repeated praise for responsiveness and care. The experience sours for some residents post-move-in: maintenance delays stretch weeks or months, pest problems persist despite baits, and inconsistent enforcement of parking rules has led to surprise tows. Deposit disputes and amenity outages add to the friction, and high manager turnover leaves residents uncertain who to trust with serious problems.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Madison Northridge
#29
68

Madison Northridge

4.0(243)✓ Google-verified

Staff earn consistent praise for speed and warmth, particularly Renee and Martin in leasing and maintenance. The location near The Domain and local parks appeals to many. But numerous long-term residents report disconnect between listing photos and actual unit quality, plus recurring AC failures, incomplete repairs, and bathroom issues that maintenance patches over without addressing root causes. The property works well for short-stay newcomers but friction builds for those staying longer. Rent runs around $1,200 per month for one-bedroom units. Reviewers note responsive management and a safe feel, though non-gated grounds mean occasional package theft. The pool and outdoor spaces draw praise from some, yet maintenance backlog appears chronic, leaving residents frustrated when the same problems cycle every few months.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Windsor Ridge Apartments
#30
68

Windsor Ridge Apartments

4.0(200)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Windsor Ridge draws strong praise for front-desk friendliness, especially Hannah and Victoria, and maintenance speed (often within 2 hours), but persistent complaints about management responsiveness to serious issues cloud the experience. Long-standing residents report months-long fights over water damage, security breaches (32+ cars broken into), unauthorized gate access, and disputed utility bills, while lease cancellation terms have raised legal concerns. High satisfaction among newer residents and those with routine needs contrasts sharply with frustration from long-term renters facing chronic problems.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Windsor Republic Place Apartments
#31
70

Windsor Republic Place Apartments

4.2(199)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents love the speed of maintenance (often one hour) and the personal touches from named staff members like Ashley and Terah who go above and beyond. The grounds feel secure and calm, and amenities are clean and well-kept. However, the community struggles with leasing office responsiveness and a pattern of plumbing, appliance, and soundproofing issues that frustrate newcomers, some waiting weeks for fixes. The move-in experience is often messy: delayed keys, missing parking stickers, and unprepared fobs appear in multiple reviews. Long-term renewing tenants report being priced out when their leases come up (charged $1,600 while new residents pay $1,400 for the same unit), creating resentment. Despite the marketing hype around resident satisfaction awards, the reality for many feels like a disconnect between management promises and day-to-day execution.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
AMLI Lakeline
#32
70

AMLI Lakeline

4.1(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and units themselves are stylish with solid amenities. Management's failure to enforce lease rules on noise and smoking creates frustration for tenants who document problems for months without resolution. Move-out fees draw complaints, and some residents report missing packages with limited recourse.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Abelia Flats
#33
70

Abelia Flats

4.1(199)✓ Google-verified

Abelia Flats draws strong praise for maintenance speed and front-desk friendliness, with several long-term renters citing low prices and responsive staff. However, significant complaints center on surprise utility charges after move-out, deposit disputes, pest issues in units, and cleanliness problems in shared spaces; management responsiveness on documentation requests varied, and some felt charges were unfairly applied despite Texas renter codes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingLuxury Apartments
Fivetwo at Highland
#34
75

Fivetwo at Highland

4.4(520)✓ Google-verified

Luis and Sophia at the leasing desk earn consistent praise for friendly, patient service and genuine care. Move-ins are smooth and tours informative. Behind that, though, residents hit a wall: maintenance backlogs stretch to three weeks or longer, security cameras and access doors stay broken for months, and vehicle break-ins recur. Premium rent gets paired with appliance failures, surprise fees, and a front office that treats complaints dismissively. The modern spaces and location attract tenants. The operational gaps and feeling of nickel-and-diming keep them frustrated. Residents highlight fiber internet, high ceilings, and proximity to I-35 and ACC Highland. Luis is named repeatedly for going beyond the job. But once you move in, maintenance becomes a source of dread, and you're watching your car in a garage with a broken camera.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Griffis at The Domain
#35
67

Griffis at The Domain

4.0(592)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong leasing and maintenance teams earn consistent praise for speed and personal attention, especially Kelsey, Derrick, and Rhone. However, management communication lapses, noise issues, and inconsistent follow-up on repairs (fitness equipment, internet) frustrate residents. Pet amenities are solid, but soundproofing and parking garage reliability need work.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
MAA Balcones Woods
#36
60

MAA Balcones Woods

3.5(263)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff at the leasing office-especially Tila Newbery and Kayla Gordon-earn consistent praise for patience, warmth, and clear communication during the application and move-in process. Residents describe a genuine sense of community and fast maintenance turnaround. However, a meaningful share report serious gaps: poor follow-up communication that leads to late fees, maintenance requests that languish (water damage, roach infestations, structural repairs), and missing gym facilities. The experience appears sharply split between smooth initial entry and ongoing operational friction. Lawn service disturbances, noise from the pool, and package theft round out regular complaints. Those praising the property often mention long tenure and emotional attachment; those with the worst experiences cite documented maintenance failures and unresponsive management that escalated into legal disputes.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Starburst Apartments
#37
66

Starburst Apartments

3.9(647)✓ Google-verified

Starburst's leasing team, especially Yolizz, Gabriella, and Ana, earn consistent praise for warm, attentive service that eases the application and move-in process. Maintenance responds quickly once engaged. However, persistent noise complaints from neighboring residents and cars, alongside parking shortages during busy hours, undercut the experience for some renters. The community is improving under new management, with work order turnaround and staff responsiveness notably better than in earlier months. Unit layouts do not always match website descriptions (advertised 1-bedrooms may be studios without interior doors). Those prioritizing staff attention and quick resolution should tour; noise-sensitive renters should ask about building-specific conditions first.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Waters at Willow Run
#38
68

Waters at Willow Run

4.0(240)✓ Google-verified

Residents and applicants praise staff like Gael for patient, professional leasing support and commend the community as clean, quiet, and well-maintained. Maintenance work orders close fast. The major friction point is the gap between website availability and reality: long waitlists (200-300+ people) frustrate applicants who drive in expecting appointments, and the automated chatbot and front desk sometimes fail to coordinate or update information. Many residents feel safe and settled; Alma's maintenance work is repeatedly highlighted as efficient and reliable. But prospective tenants report a disconnect between the online interface and staff knowledge, leaving some feeling the application process is a waste of time when units aren't actually open.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Check availability for student housing in Austin, TX

No cost and no obligation. Share a few details and we'll connect you with a good fit.

Check availability
Oak Park Apartments
#39
72

Oak Park Apartments

4.1(131)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise maintenance crews for lightning-fast repairs and genuine friendliness. Alex, Cory, and Roberto fix problems same-day or within 72 hours; staff like Texie in the office take concerns seriously. The trade-off: it's an older complex, and security is a real problem. Bike and car theft happen regularly with no guard or cameras, management won't fund them, and transients roam the property. One tenant with an 8-year lease calls it a bargain for square footage near campus, despite persistent weed smell and aging infrastructure.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Beck at Wells Branch
#40
58

Beck at Wells Branch

3.3(480)✓ Google-verified

Rachel and the new management team earn consistent praise for fast, caring responses to residents' concerns. However, the property struggles with long-standing maintenance backlog, persistent neighbor noise, and a pattern of infrastructure failures (gates, pool, fencing). Recent management changes signal improvement, but reviews show the community faces a gap between front-office service and grounds upkeep.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Sabina
#41
71

Sabina

3.9(213)✓ Google-verified

Most residents experience a welcoming community with responsive staff, clean units, and reliable maintenance. Sabina attracts UT and law students with proximity to campus, a quiet setting, and regular social events. However, elevator maintenance and one leasing agent's handling of customer inquiries and availability information have created friction for prospective tenants. The property offers spacious apartments with modern finishes, in-unit washer-dryers, and outdoor spaces. Long-term residents report consistent professionalism from renewal and maintenance teams. Prospective residents should verify current availability and pricing directly before touring, as website information has not always matched leasing conversations.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
The James on Grand Avenue
#42
63

The James on Grand Avenue

3.8(102)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise responsive maintenance, fair pricing, and staff like Rakhi and Luis who handle the move-in process with care. The units and common grounds are kept clean, and the North Austin location near MoPac and The Domain draws commuters. However, roach complaints, inconsistent hallway and elevator cleaning, and some tenants' disruptive behavior (noise at the pool, unsupervised pets, trash in shared spaces) undercut the experience for longer-term residents.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Astra Avery Ranch
#43
65

Astra Avery Ranch

3.9(143)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews highlight attentive staff, competitive pricing, and solid amenities, while recent one-star accounts describe structural problems. Thin floors allow neighbor noise to carry through clearly; plumbing issues persist despite requests. Some residents report management responds promptly and empathetically; others describe slow communication and dismissive handling of serious issues like week-long kitchen sink outages and low-frequency noise complaints.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 Housing
Altair Tech Ridge
#44
63

Altair Tech Ridge

3.9(111)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff and management stand out for genuine care and problem-solving, especially during tours and early residency. Amenities draw residents in-gym, pool, dog facilities, beer garden-and many find the complex safe and peaceful. The stumble comes after the lease is signed: maintenance delays mount (broken grills, pool chlorinated weekends, unresponsive EV charger support), move-in units arrive uncleaned, visitor parking runs short, and gate issues persist. Screening decisions lack transparency. Those who stay long-term tend to forgive the friction; those who encounter problems early often regret the price.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Village at Gracy Farms
#45
63

Village at Gracy Farms

3.7(225)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The front-of-house experience shines: leasing agent Andrea earns repeated praise for friendly, patient tours, and some maintenance staff like Rodrigo deliver fast responses. The property grounds are clean and quiet. But the behind-the-scenes failures are severe and persistent. Residents report infestation problems management has failed to solve after a year, emergency maintenance delays when medicines were locked away, and cleaning deposits unreturned nearly a year after move-out despite repeated follow-up emails. The gap between the welcoming tour and the daily living experience is stark. Management communication appears broken. A resident describing a major pest crisis reports being falsely marked down as refusing service; another says management never contacted them about the problem despite their own maintenance worker eventually organizing a full cleanout. Deposit disputes linger in legal territory. For those who get responsive maintenance like Rodrigo, the experience improves. But the pattern across reviews suggests this requires luck or persistence rather than consistent policy.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Presidium Tech Ridge Apartments
#46
60

Presidium Tech Ridge Apartments

3.6(128)✓ Google-verified

New residents often praise the leasing staff (Alondra, Bailey, Danna named repeatedly) and the complex's striking modern design and amenities. However, longer-term tenants report serious gaps: bathroom vanity lights and dishwashers have taken months to repair, the pool water quality is frequently flagged as poor, and gym access cuts off at night. Management promises rapid follow-up that often does not materialize, and some tenants describe retaliation after filing complaints. Maintenance issues escalate in severity as lease terms extend; reviewers staying beyond three months cite appliances left unfixed for eight to ten months, EV chargers offline for extended periods, and common areas neglected even after staff promise same-day cleanup. Staff friendliness and initial lease terms have earned loyal reviews, but responsiveness to actual problems appears inconsistent and complaint resolution appears to stall once residency begins.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Terrastone Travesia Apartments
#47
60

Terrastone Travesia Apartments

3.7(204)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong five-star reviews highlight Florita's outstanding leasing assistance and a well-kept property with green spaces and clean areas. However, residents report significant frustration with move-out charges, slow communication after lease end, and property management handling of rental records and application fees.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Loretta
#48
61

The Loretta

3.9(45)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Isaac, the maintenance technician, earns consistent five-star mentions for fast, considerate service and keeping grounds litter-free. However, deeper complaints surface around office dysfunction: delayed deposit refunds, security indifference to vehicle theft, and a serious allegation of disability discrimination in income verification that allegedly resulted in $8,000+ overcharges. The split between maintenance praise and office-level failures defines the experience here.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Residences at the Domain
#49
59

Residences at the Domain

3.1(222)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals report sharply different experiences. Some who have stayed multiple years praise staff responsiveness and the location; however, the majority of reviewers describe aging buildings, broken elevators, and maintenance that does not stick. The property's biggest friction point is parking: residents report vehicles towed from spots with missing or unclear signage, with management refusing accountability. A second major pain is hidden fees. Residents discover $70/month mandatory WiFi charges, separate electric bills for chiller systems, credit card payment processing fees, and newly announced parking charges. Staff member Karissa receives consistent praise for helpfulness, but others are described as dismissive or rude. The gap between the "luxury" positioning and actual conditions frustrates tenants most.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Wayman
#50
59

The Wayman

3.5(382)✓ Google-verified

Leasing and office staff shine: Joel, Tanya, and the team consistently earn praise for patient, knowledgeable tours and professional handling of applications. Residents appreciate the location near the Domain, pool, outdoor kitchen, and peaceful surroundings. However, the property struggles with maintenance execution. Multiple tenants report water leaks from pipe bursts and ceiling fans, slow repairs (including a 7-month dishwasher delay), cockroach infestations, and management reluctance to offer credits for resident-affecting damage. New management appears to have improved responsiveness, but systemic issues remain. The sharp split between five-star tours and one-star resident complaints suggests the leasing experience masks operational shortcomings once tenants move in. The pet-friendly and student housing markets should note: first impressions are polished, but property condition and maintenance speed are points of friction. Veterinary-damage claims and pest concerns warrant direct questions during tours.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Ascent North
#51
53

Ascent North

3.4(193)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Ascent North draws praise for standout maintenance technicians and competitive pricing, but long-term residents report a complex marked by systemic failures. Air conditioning repairs drag on for weeks or months in Texas heat, roaches persist despite treatment promises, office staff rarely answer phones or follow up, and management offers only token refunds when problems destroy property or ruin food. The property looks polished on tours, but daily life inside involves finding parking spots after 15 minutes, mold, billing surprises, and a leasing office that dismisses concerns. New tenants or those in good buildings may avoid trouble; those landing in problem units or staying longer face mounting frustration and unmet repair requests.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Terrazzo
#52
59

Terrazzo

3.1(227)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The office team earns genuine praise for friendliness and responsiveness, and the location near the Arboretum and Domain appeals to many. However, numerous tenants describe a stark divide: maintenance requests either go unfixed for months or receive cosmetic fixes that fail within days (doors, screens, AC). Residents report arriving to tour appointments with no greeting, misleading lease terms, and pest problems left untreated despite multiple complaints. While some praise quick help with repairs, many more say maintenance staff look at issues and leave without action, then face exit fees for damage the complex failed to repair. Several tenants who've been there months report the same unit-level breakdowns repeating. Whether a leasing visit goes smoothly or you face a long repair delay appears inconsistent, making the experience feel unpredictable.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments
Canyon Springs at Bull Creek
#53
59

Canyon Springs at Bull Creek

3.6(61)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the scenic Bull Creek location, quiet grounds, and friendly leasing staff, with several noting fast approval processes and helpful tours. However, recent reviews reveal significant frustration: maintenance backlogs stretch weeks, aging appliances fail repeatedly, and management has been accused of poor communication and dismissive behavior toward serious issues like water damage and mold. Staff consistency appears pivotal to satisfaction.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Creekside on Parmer Lane
#54
58

Creekside on Parmer Lane

3.4(172)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Reviewers report sharp differences in experience. Those who moved in recently praise quick maintenance response and friendly staff, particularly noting Billy and Margarita. Longer-term residents describe declining conditions: ants, hornets in stairwells, filthy shared spaces, parking shortages, and $800 monthly towing fees. Management communication is mixed-some find staff transparent and helpful; others report gatekeeping behavior, unresponsive leadership, and accusations without clear proof. The application process drew complaints about unclear documentation requirements and non-refundable fees.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Gallery at Domain
#55
58

Gallery at Domain

3.4(479)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the maintenance crew's speed and the community events that foster genuine connection. However, newer residents report troubling patterns: misleading lease terms, aggressive deposit deductions for normal wear, pest infestations staff ignores, and office communication that ranges from dismissive to hostile. The keyless entry fails monthly, gym equipment breaks and stays broken, and packages vanish from front doors. Residents weighing this complex face a deep divide: stay years and enjoy the perks, or risk costly conflicts at move-out and ongoing issues during your stay. Strong in place and social life; weak in management integrity and problem-solving.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsAffordable & Section 8 Housing
West Cove Apartments
#56
57 low data

West Cove Apartments

3.8(14)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

West Cove offers budget-friendly rentals in Anderson Mill with occasional specials, but reviews consistently flag slow maintenance response (repairs waiting months) and management that is hard to reach. Move-out disputes over normal wear and tear, bed bug incidents handled as tenant responsibility, and pest problems make this a case where low upfront rent may not reflect true cost of occupancy.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Bridge at Midtown Commons Apartments
#57
63

Bridge at Midtown Commons Apartments

3.7(402)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team, especially Cheyenne, Kory, Tyler, and Shelby, earn consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness during tours and lease handling. Maintenance staff like Aliex Artiles have impressed residents with prompt and thorough work. The location near public transit, modern kitchens with stainless steel and granite, and quiet neighborhoods appeal to many tenants. However, residents report broken exterior doors and security gates that stay unfixed for months, nonfunctional elevators, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, package theft, and hallway cleanliness issues. Move-in inspections sometimes reveal roaches, mold, and damage. Responsiveness varies: some praise quick turnarounds, while others note the front office requires multiple emails to act. For the price point, opinions split between "solid value" and "not worth the headaches."

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
Oakville Apartments
#58
59

Oakville Apartments

3.4(275)✓ Google-verified

Oakville draws strong praise for amenities, layout, and a few standout staff members, but residents consistently battle unresponsive management, recurring AC breakdowns that linger for weeks, and pests. Communication gaps mean maintenance enters without notice despite requests, gates malfunction routinely, and billing disputes arise at moveout. The property feels split: maintenance crews are competent and kind, yet the leasing office frustrates those seeking answers or timely fixes.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
MacKenzie Pointe Apartments
#59
81

MacKenzie Pointe Apartments

4.5(128)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise MacKenzie Pointe for affordable rent relative to quality and location, backed by a responsive management team (Margaret and Daniel frequently named) and proactive maintenance. The gated security, pest-free units, and strong sense of community appeal to long-term renters and dog owners. Complaints are minimal; one resident cited unwanted contact from a third-party locator, and another noted seasonal bird droppings, which another reviewer contextualized as preferable to heat.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Townhollow Apartments
#60
61

Townhollow Apartments

3.9(77)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff, especially Cesar, Carlos, and Cameron, are consistently praised for same-day or next-day repairs and genuine care for residents. Location near South Lamar and downtown offers strong value, though the 3.9-star rating masks deep divides: security concerns (homeless encampments, car break-ins), property manager communication gaps, and leasing delays frustrate renters, while recent management under Jillian and Celeste has improved responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Folio Apartments
#61
54

Folio Apartments

3.3(271)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing tours here can be smooth, and new residents report quick fixes for urgent maintenance calls. The fitness room and multiple pools draw praise, as does the North Austin location near the Domain. But staying reveals structural problems: thin walls transmit neighbor noise relentlessly, bedrooms stay hot despite AC running, appliances age poorly and break, and parking spaces are cramped. After you sign, management shifts-complaints about noise violations and broken equipment go unaddressed, security concerns after garage break-ins linger for weeks, and gate failures happen regularly. Residents face high move-out fees and challenged security deposits, often backed by the corporate owner (Greystar). The dog parks lack proper drainage and maintenance; raccoons overrun trash bins nightly; and building systems struggle with basic tasks like lighting poolside areas or preparing for winter weather. Office staff have been described as indifferent to resident problems once leases are signed. Multiple residents regret moving in and warn others away, citing a gap between the polished tour experience and the daily reality of living here.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Point South and Bridge Hollow Apartments
#62
58

Point South and Bridge Hollow Apartments

3.1(145)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the Riverside location, responsive staff, and particularly the affordability. Management and maintenance address problems quickly, and those staying past the first year often renew. The grounds feel safe to many, with low crime relative to nearby student housing. However, pest problems divide reviewers sharply-some see roaches as minimal, others report infestations. Walls are thin enough to hear neighbors clearly. Parking lacks cameras, creating theft worry. Most troubling are reports that leasing staff misrepresented applicant approval, collecting fees from rejected applicants, and a pattern of charging renewals above market rates while advertising lower prices to newcomers.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mosaic at Mueller Luxury Apartments
#63
58

Mosaic at Mueller Luxury Apartments

3.1(322)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star residents praise responsive maintenance and leasing staff like Sabrina, who guide them through move-in smoothly and handle urgent requests the same day. The gym, pool, Mueller location, and floor plans earn genuine enthusiasm. But nearly half the reviews are one or two stars, driven by severe operational failures: elevators down for months, package theft rampant enough that residents use grocery stores instead, persistent rat and roach infestations, dirty stairwells, a broken garage gate since mid-2025, and code-lock doors that fail randomly. Management reportedly shrugs at unit mismatches and ignores security breaches. The building receives city violations. Long-term residents call it unreliable; others question whether luxury pricing justifies the chaos.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Morgan
#64
54

The Morgan

3.1(444)✓ Google-verified

The Morgan suffers from widespread maintenance neglect, management dysfunction, and serious habitability issues. A rat infestation persists because Greystar management owes the pest control contractor over a thousand dollars while still charging residents for the service. Repeated complaints about broken air conditioning, water damage, screens never installed, and dishwashers that do not work go unresolved for weeks or months. Residents report being ignored by the leasing office, lied to about repair status, and treated with hostility when they escalate concerns; one military resident spent $75 on laundry elsewhere while waiting months for an in-unit washer to be fixed. The recent management change from CAF to Greystar in October 2025 brought additional chaos: rent payment systems failed, repeated emergency emails blamed residents, and basic supplies (window screens, replacement parts) are not being ordered. The office is operating out of a vacant apartment during renovations. A small handful of staff members receive praise for warmth during leasing, but the overall tone from management is dismissive and confrontational. Security issues include homeless encampments and vandalism; the community pool has been dark since summer and likely unusable. Prospective residents should expect slow repairs, poor communication, and a frustrating experience despite the model unit's appearance.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
District on La Frontera
#65
54

District on La Frontera

2.9(355)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report a complex marked by roach infestations, broken appliances left unfixed for months, and maintenance that either ignores requests or botches repairs. Staff documentation appears unreliable, with work orders falsely closed as complete. A handful of residents praise individual staff members (Luz Fundora, Lisa in later reviews, unnamed "Cuban lady"), but these isolated bright spots cannot override the scale and severity of complaints about habitability, pest control failures, drainage problems, and management indifference. The gym has remained closed for several months, pools have been sporadically available, and unit turnover leaves apartments visibly dirty and broken. Residents moved out mid-lease or refused to pay rent due to unresolved conditions. More recent reviews hint at some staff changes improving responsiveness, yet safety concerns (no fire extinguisher, drug found at pool, aggressive towing practices, loose maintenance equipment) and core maintenance failures persist. The 2.9 rating across 355 reviews reflects a property where systemic operational collapse overshadows rare individual courtesy.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Camino Flats Apartments
#66
71

Camino Flats Apartments

4.3(67)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Two years of consistent care define the experience here. Residents repeatedly credit Marla and Coco for turning responsiveness into habit-maintenance calls get real-time phone updates, small problems vanish in hours, and the office staff treat lease issues as personal. The apartments themselves are spacious and actually equipped with washers, dryers, and full kitchens, a rarity in student housing. The gated grounds feel safe and quiet despite being a short walk to UT Austin. Location wins over age. The four-minute walk to the bus, grocery stores nearby, and proximity to campus offset the fact that this is an older building (you'll see water-damage patches on some ceilings, though they stayed out of most units). Weekly pest control keeps insects rare. The courtyards, fire pit, and outdoor TV create real social space. West Campus noise from nearby fraternities happens here like everywhere in that zone.

Student HousingTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Greystone Flats Apartments
#67
57

Greystone Flats Apartments

3.1(99)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Greystone split sharply after a management change. For years under Ellen and Cruz, residents praised responsive maintenance, good value, and a peaceful, dog-friendly vibe near campus. Since the recent takeover, multiple reviews report an empty pool all summer, ignored AC failures, cockroach and flea problems, closed office hours, and staff departures. The tension is stark: five-star loyalty from the prior era clashes with one-star warnings from recent months about deteriorating conditions and unreachable management. The property occupies a real space between segments. Its starting rents ($999-$1,569/month) and in-unit washer/dryer appeal to students and budget-conscious renters, yet older bones (1970s-80s buildings) and recent service failures undercut any "luxury" positioning. Pets are welcome with a bark park, though reviewers note it goes unmaintained. The management crisis is the pivot point: the same buildings that residents once called a hidden gem now face questions about basic upkeep and tenant care.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Vantage at McKinney Falls
#68
68

Vantage at McKinney Falls

4.5(92)✓ Google-verified

Vantage's leasing and resident-facing staff earn genuine praise for their patience and follow-through: Julissa, Karla, and others routinely help renters find units quickly and solve problems on first contact. However, multiple recent reviews document a sharp divide. Residents moved in during an earlier management period report satisfaction with maintenance speed and clean grounds; those who renewed leases after a management transition describe month-long air-conditioning failures without repair, repeated billing mistakes, and staff who ignore maintenance requests and unanswered emails. The gap between five-star lease experiences and one-star residency suggests execution breaks down after move-in.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Warwick Apartments
#69
68

Warwick Apartments

4.0(40)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the maintenance team's speed and kindness, with multiple five-star reviews naming Alex and Corey for fixing issues within hours. Staff in the front office and leasing are described as helpful and organized. The Heritage location near UT and downtown appeals to tenants seeking both access and relative quiet. Remodeled units feel modern, though the complex itself is older and comes with typical aging-building quirks that residents say are manageable. The property management company (Rainier Properties) handles day-to-day operations professionally. Lease renewal is common among long-term residents. Review evidence is substantial but focuses heavily on maintenance and leasing experience; other apartment amenities and community life receive minimal mention.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Stone Oak at Parmer
#70
59

Stone Oak at Parmer

3.3(220)✓ Google-verified

Leasing agents Yankel, Quay, and James earn consistent praise for patience, bilingual support, and genuine care during move-in. Maintenance speed is a tale of two experiences: some get urgent repairs within hours, while others wait weeks with no response on the web portal unless they visit in person. Long-time residents report deteriorating management follow-through on noise complaints and a four-year-old broken sewage line that recurs every three months. The property itself stays quiet and feels friendly, with good amenities and quick response on routine requests. However, the maintenance team appears chronically overwhelmed, and serious problems like faulty plumbing get postponed indefinitely. If your issue is simple and urgent, escalate it in person; if it's complex or chronic, the staff's track record suggests patience is not guaranteed.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome & Garden-Style Communities
Villas at Stone Oak Ranch
#71
67

Villas at Stone Oak Ranch

3.9(237)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance and staff excellence divide sharply from management disputes over deposits. Multiple residents praise Jose, Michael, Dina, and Heather for quick repairs and genuine care; the property itself is attractive and well-kept, with free parking and valet trash. However, one detailed two-year resident documented management keeping their entire $2,000 security deposit plus $150 extra for carpet replacement despite timestamped evidence of no damage, citing normal wear and tear after two years. Management allegedly refused to provide photos, inspection reports, or specifics, dismissed dispute claims with form responses, and the same leasing officer (Rebecca Owens) who approved the move-out inspected it but later denied the claim via email. Another resident reported false promises about free cleaning, being told carpet is always replaced when tenants leave, and unexpected trash fees charged to all residents for some residents' misuse.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Sienna at the Thompson
#72
66

Sienna at the Thompson

4.1(138)✓ Google-verified

First-time tours and short-stay residents consistently praise the leasing staff, Tabitha in particular, along with downtown views and building design. Long-term residents paint a starkly different picture: chronic elevator outages cause 15-20 minute waits, amenities deteriorate without upkeep, the $200 parking fee and new $200 amenity club fee feel unjustified when maintenance falters, street noise and homeless harassment compromise safety, and air conditioning failures go uncompensated. Staff theft allegations, lack of parking garage cameras, and delayed repairs erode trust. The building's core appeal-luxury finishes and location-masks operational neglect that compounds over years. Residents relocate to competing downtown buildings citing better service for similar prices. Management appears responsive during leasing but inconsistent in resident retention.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Eastwood
#73
56

The Eastwood

3.4(63)✓ Google-verified

The Eastwood splits sharply between those who praise Donna's leasing help and the maintenance team's responsiveness, and those burnt by management turmoil, poor communication, and unresolved deposit disputes. Recent reviews flag the pool closed for weeks with fees still charged, a dirty laundry room with cramped $2.35-per-load machines, and rent that feels high given the wear on units. Location near UT Austin and transit are genuine draws for students, but management's inconsistency is the core complaint.

Student HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Penthouse Apartments
#74
58 low data

Penthouse Apartments

3.7(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Penthouse scores well for location and staff kindness, with residents consistently praising quick maintenance fixes and the friendly office team. Older infrastructure and inconsistent management practices drag the experience down: water damage goes unaddressed, pest control falls through, and tenants report poor communication during leasing and work order delays.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
River Oaks Apartments
#75
57

River Oaks Apartments

3.4(49)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the staff's attentiveness and the unbeatable location near UT and downtown Austin, with competitive pricing for the area. Maintenance staff like Pepe and Martin handle requests quickly, and leasing agent Toni earns consistent recognition for making the move-in process effortless and professional. The main friction points are the seasonal heating-AC system that can't switch mid-season, persistent roach presence despite pest control efforts, and the reality of an older building with thinner walls and limited closet space. Residents who accept these trade-offs for the affordable rent and location find it a genuine bargain; those expecting newer finishes are disappointed.

Affordable & Section 8 HousingStudent HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
San Gabriel Square
#76
47

San Gabriel Square

2.7(68)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers praise San Gabriel Square for its UT-adjacent location, low rent, and genuinely warm front-desk staff-especially Zoe, who speaks Spanish and answers questions patiently. However, a sharp recent turn: multiple tenants report widespread roach infestations even in clean units, non-functional washers leaving stains, no in-unit thermostats, and erratic water temperature. Move-out charges ($460+) and $75 admin fees frustrate departing residents. Maintenance does respond on some issues, but structural pest and mechanical problems persist unresolved.

Student Housing

Connect with featured partners to check availability

How many apartments do you want to compare

By sending this inquiry, you agree it will be shared with the leasing offices and property managers relevant to your request.

When you submit a quote or contact form, your enquiry may go to partner providers who can do the work, and we may earn a referral fee. Our rankings and scores come from our published method only, independent of any referral fees.

Common questions about student housing

How much does student housing cost in Austin, TX?
Rates vary widely by proximity to campus and how new the property is. Older, farther-out buildings near Riverside or North Campus tend to run cheaper per bed than newer high-rises in West Campus, and per-bed pricing usually rises with private bathrooms, in-unit laundry, and included amenities like a pool or gym. Always ask for the total monthly cost including utilities and fees, not just the advertised base rent.
When should I start looking for student housing?
Many popular Austin properties near UT start leasing for the next school year as early as the previous fall, sometimes 10 to 12 months ahead. Waiting until summer before move-in usually means a smaller pool of units and less room to negotiate on price or lease length.
What should I expect from a lease term?
Most student housing in Austin runs on 12-month leases starting in August, even though the school year ends in May. Some properties offer shorter or academic-year leases, but they are less common and often priced higher per month. Check the sublease policy if you plan to be away for a summer.
How can I judge the quality of a student housing property before signing?
Look past the marketing photos and check recent resident reviews for patterns on maintenance response time, noise, and how the leasing office handles move-out charges. A property with consistently reported quick maintenance turnaround and clear billing tends to be a safer bet than one with a nice pool but scattered complaints about deposits or repairs.

Last updated 2026-09-08